In matching toddler utterances to semantic relations, "Doggie eat" best matches which relation?

The utterance "Doggie eat" exemplifies the Agent + Action relation. In this context, the term "Doggie" serves as the agent or the doer of the action, while "eat" describes the action being performed. Understanding this combination is essential as it reflects how toddlers begin to construct sentences by identifying who is doing what, showcasing a fundamental aspect of language development.

The other options represent different semantic relations: Action + Object would typically pair an action with the object being acted upon, such as in "Doggie eat cookie." Attribute + Entity would involve describing characteristics of entities, like "big doggie," and Recurrence would express the idea of something happening again, which does not apply here. Thus, the structure of the utterance clearly aligns with the Agent + Action relation, highlighting a significant milestone in early language acquisition.